dmmackay
04-13-2009, 07:41 PM
I have been using PowerFolder for a couple months now with non mission critical data (Shared templates, Reports, etc..) across seven locations via VPN and love it. It has been working flawlessly. I have production data (the actual client files) that I have been using some other software (Syncback) to sync each night to all my offices. I am considering switching them to PowerFolder but wondering what performance would be like on this scale.
I have just under 200,000 files, across 250 folders. Total size is approx 4.5 gigs. On average about 100 files change per day in each office. What kind of resources (Ram/Proc) would that eat up on each server in each office. I have 4 larger offices that have there own server that Powerfolder runs on that I am not to concerned over, but 3 of the offices are smaller and staff actually use the computer with PowerFolder running on them.
Also, if a file changes in two locations, I assume it just takes the latest version?
I am posting this here to get both devs and hopefully some user opinions who may be in this scenerio.
Thanks in advance, great product. I just canceled my Syncplicity account in favor of PowerFolder for home use as well.
Mike
I have just under 200,000 files, across 250 folders. Total size is approx 4.5 gigs. On average about 100 files change per day in each office. What kind of resources (Ram/Proc) would that eat up on each server in each office. I have 4 larger offices that have there own server that Powerfolder runs on that I am not to concerned over, but 3 of the offices are smaller and staff actually use the computer with PowerFolder running on them.
Also, if a file changes in two locations, I assume it just takes the latest version?
I am posting this here to get both devs and hopefully some user opinions who may be in this scenerio.
Thanks in advance, great product. I just canceled my Syncplicity account in favor of PowerFolder for home use as well.
Mike